|
What
makes a good outdoor portrait ?
By Nelson Tan
|
|
There are many things which affects how a portrait might eventually turn out. That includes the following factors:
Make-up for photography
is different from daily make-up. Colours will not render as strong as in
real life on film, so you'd have to apply more or use slightly stronger
colours. This is especially true if you're using low-contrast pastel coloured
films. Did you know that black-and-white photography demands a different
set of palette of make-up too ??
Good equipment
need not be high-tech and expensive. Always use a lenshood whenever possible.
And unless you have rock-steady hands, use a support. A monopod is preferable
to a tripod. It is much more maneuverable and offers the right amount of
support without being clumsy. Monopods and lenshoods are among the most
underrated photographic equipment.
A good printer
can be the difference between a fantastic print or a mediocre one. Don't
skimp on the final stage. Why spend thousands of dollars buying the best
lenses and cameras with the finest films, and ruin the overall results
with a one-hour neighborhood lab ?
Use a lightmeter for a incident reading whenever possible. It is more reliable than a reflected reading from your camera, no matter what gizmos your camera may contain e.g. matrix D or what-have-you. It won’t be fooled by white or black fabrics. Take into account any filters. If you're using a variable zoom such as a 70-210mm f4-5.6, you'll run into the problem of not knowing what is the exact light transmission of your lens at different focal length. Negative films benefit from slight over-exposure of around 1 or 2 stops. This gives it allowance against underexposure. A slightly over-exposed negative will yield better shadow detail and fine grain structure. A custom printer will always smile when he gets a slightly overexposed negative, because he can pull out shadow details from it. On the other hand, there is little he can do about a under-exposed negative. The prints will inevitably be brown and murky, and very grainy too !!! Positives, chromes,
transparencies or slides - whatever you call them, benefit from a dose
of under-exposure. Slides have very narrow exposure latitude, so be very
careful about your exposure. Make sure it is dead-on. Giving slides a slight
under-exposure compensation of 1/3 stops to 1/2 or 2/3 stops gives it very
punchy colours and a slightly denser look. Depending on how you want the
final output of the slide to be - whether it is to be a R-print, Ilfochrome
print or in a publication, this may or may not be required.
Light is very
important in a shoot. In fact, it is beyond words to describe how important
it is. Why? Photography is basically a phrase of the words "drawing with
light". Light is the principle ingredient in photography !! Without light,
you can forget about taking pictures. When I use the word light, I mean
good light that is flattering to portraiture, not just any junk light.
I find that dawn and dusk periods provide the best light - warm and soft.
Of course, we must recognize that it is not possible to get good light
all the time, but what I want to say is that lighting can make or break
a picture. See the next point for more details on lighting.
Light modification is what I call for the techniques used to change the nature of natural lighting. There are basically a few types of technique:
Diffusion is when the light is too harsh, such as a mid-day sun. You will get much better results if you use a large diffusing screen to diffuse the light. The screen can be bought commercially from Lasolite or made from some white transparent cloths held together by PVC pipes joined to make a frame. You'll lose 1 to 2 stops of light, but much better quality lighting. The diffusing screen may cast a blue tint on the subject, so you may want to use a 81A warming filter to warm things up a bit. You will lose 1/2 or 1 stop again, or you can correct the tint during printing. That's why as I said before, you need a good printer !! Fill-in flash is to put light into places where there is no light or insufficient light using flash. Direct flash, whether used as fill-in or on its own, has as much usage to me as a ash-tray on a motorcycle. It is way too harsh and frequently very obvious. My favorite fill-in technique is those employed by the famous Annie Leibovitz. She cuts off extraneous light sources using a large black screen and fills in using a large softbox on a powerful studio strobe, to give even and warm lighting on the subject, while the background is bathed in natural lighting. It is amazing how well she does it, and how natural she makes it seem. You can see the famous American Express advertisements series which shows famous people in different settings. It looks as if all of them were lighted by extremely warm and gentle rays from a setting sun. Cutting off is the usage of black flags or cards to reduce the light from one side. Sometimes it is necessary to cut off light to show form of an object. When a model is lighted by a overcast sky, the lighting is often flat and soft. This may make the model's face seem too round and chubby. Using a black flag on one side (kept out of the camera's view of course) will cast some shadows on one side to show some form of the cheekbones. Of course, a good make-up artist would brush the cheekbones ever so slightly to bring out the features of the face. I said, use a make-up artist !! Reflectors are
just like the opposite of black flags. Instead of cutting back light, they
induce more lights into areas where light is lacking. They are basically
just white or silver cards/fabrics to bounce back some light onto the subject,
to reduce contrast. They are available commercially from Lasolite or you
can make your own, using some ingenuity.
Location Ever wondered
why I placed location last in the list ?? There is no coincidence. IMO,
location is the least important. Why?? Because in most shoots, the background
is out-of-focus. Only the subject is the focal point. The surroundings
serves only as the defocused background. Of course, I'm not suggesting
a total disregard for the location, but what I'm saying is that out of
all the mentioned factors, the other 10 easily surpass the location factor
in importance. I'd rather have the first ten factors in control than be
given a good location but a lousy subject. After all, this is about portrait
photography, not architecture or landscape photography !!
|